2011-07-18 09:16:27 UTC
For example, in Star Wars, we ignore the fact that these characters who live in a galaxy, far, far away, all look human and speak English. And by suspending our disbelief, we are able to enjoy the story. The writer (or producer) breaks this implicit contract when they make things more unrealistic than necessary, or suddenly introduce new aspects of unrealism. For example, people complain that in Episode III, when some characters have a fight near a stream of molten lava, that they don't get skin burns.
It seems like childrens' TV writers/producers habitually break he contract. Children watching probably don't mind much, but these shows are also watched by adults (with their children) who must notice.
An example is Bob the Builder. Bob and his colleagues are builders. Their anthropomorphic vehicles (cement mixers, cranes, steam rollers, etc) all have their own distinct personalities. OK, so far, so good. There's also an anthropomorphic scarecrow. Why?
Another example is a more recent show: Octonauts. A polar bear, cat, penguin, dog, sea otter, rabbit and octopus work as undersea explorers and adventurers. Sounds OK so far. The kitchen is staffed by five half-animal half-carrot creatures. Why?
Are children's TV producers simply bad writers? Or do they just not think anybody will notice?